Juror 3 is explosive and highly emotional juror 8 thinks before speaking and is a calming influence on the jury juror 3 is loud juror 8 is quiet juror 3 expects people to agree with him and belittles people when they don't juror 8 simply puts out questions and asks people to challenge their own beliefs. Comparing and contrasting juror 3 and juror 8 from twelve angry men - in the play twelve angry men, the story line presents a variety of perspectives and opinions between twelve very different men. Students were significantly more critical than jurors of the standard remote witness room (m = −079 vs −046, t = 197, p = 005), but also more sensitive to improvements in the designed environment than were jurors (f = 043, p = 0041) the effect of this change was that the difference between the two groups in their response to the. 12 angry men is a 1957 american courtroom drama film adapted from a teleplay of the same name by reginald rose an angry juror 3 accuses juror 5, who grew up in a. The ego conflict between juror three and juror eight, along with some of the other jurors for short periods during the case, was managed by allowing juror three to express his concerns.
That juror, who is known in the script as juror #8 is the protagonist of the play as tempers flare and the arguments begin, the audience learns about each member of the jury and slowly but surely, juror #8 guides the others toward a verdict of not guilty. When an extra-judicial communication by a lawyer with a juror is permitted by law, it should be made considerately and with deference to the personal feelings of the juror  all litigants and lawyers should have access to tribunals on an equal basis. Once juror #8 has managed to sway a few of the jurors, it's time for him to go on the offensive and attack the jurors whose prejudices prevent them from changing their minds in one case, he basically calls out juror #3 for wanting to murder the defendant in cold blood by giving a guilty verdict.
By creating a strong contrast between juror 8 and juror 3, rose points out that averdict of guilty or not guilty depends on the personalities and experiences of the jurors juror #3 and juror #8 had different jobs. Juror #8: [after conducting an experiment to see if the old man could have reached his door in 15 seconds] here's what i think happened: the old man heard the fight between the boy and his father a few hours earlier. 8 juror #8 and juror #3 guilty or not guilty that is the question that 12 angry men asks from the beginning, but what drives this tale are two men who will fight for their side till the bitter end. Foreword | to examine factors affecting juror satisfaction with the jury experience and confidence in the criminal justice system, exit surveys were administered to 628 empanelled and 1,048 non-empanelled jurors in new south wales, victoria and south australia.
Tionship between a juror and a party or witness lack of juror qualifications generally refers to a juror's failure to meet standard criteria, such as citizenship, lack of a felony. The 37-year-old married father of two from a portland suburb said he pulled no punches when he filled out the juror questionnaire from federal court. Compare and contrast juror 8 and juror 3 in twelve angry men keyword essays and term papers available at echeatcom, the largest free essay community. Indeed, juror 3 and 8 have individual outlooks on the case, but i believe that even between these two diverse people, there are is one strong similarity, and that would have to be persistency in the whole play, the strongest collisions of disputes were between juror 3 and 8.
Best answer: yes i do jurors 3 and 8 started out as equals with similar feelings and understandings (since they are peers), and by half-way through the movie, you could see that they were polar opposites. Previously, juror #4 said that her testimony was good evidence, but after #9 disproves this, only #3 is left voting guilty this is the climax because at the beginning of the play, all but one (#8. One important conflict in the drama script 12 angry men by reginald rose was between juror number 3 and juror number 8 their contrasting personalities and different beliefs caused conflict between them throughout the entire play. A classic jury-room drama, twelve angry men follows a jury's decision- making process in a murder trial, tracking the gradual changing of eleven of the twelve jurors' minds about their verdict. Okay, juror #3 is the angry father, and juror #8 is the guy who stands alone in the innocent vote, right i suspect the similarities are easier to find by reading the play because the movie really shows their contrasts.
The 8th juror reminds the jurors that the onus is on the prosecution to prove guilt - not the defendant by interrogating the evidence as the defence counsel should have done, the 8th juror exposes the inconsistencies and false assumptions associated with the circumstantial evidence. Juror #3 by james patterson instant #1 new york times bestseller a young attorney tries her first case and it's murder one in a legal thriller from the world's #1 bestselling writer. Jury managers' toolbox between jurors summonsed under the 1-step process from those summonsed under the 2-step process this can be accomplished on the system. Juror #3 actually holds up the jury and if anything, at times makes them go backwards, by bullying people, such as juror #12, to change his mind juror #8 on the other hand, puts forth question and ideas that can be discussed by the other members of the jury.
Juror no 3 male, appears to be asian a financial analyst who specializes in private equity, the man seemed nervous during jury selection and barely spoke above a whisper. I need to know how juror 8 from twelve angry men is like/unlike atticus finch from to kill a mockingbird i have to write an essay and i already have 2 reasons, but i need 2 more.